tanstack-solid-start

Ecosystem: npm

Downloads: 476.98 K

Vulnerabilities from the last (months)
  • 2CriticalAffects 3 versions
  • 0HighAffects 0 versions
  • 0MediumAffects 0 versions
  • 0ModerateAffects 0 versions
  • 0LowAffects 0 versions
Severity distribution (all time)
2vulnerabilities
  • Critical2 (100.0%)
  • High0 (0.0%)
  • Medium0 (0.0%)
  • Moderate0 (0.0%)
  • Low0 (0.0%)

Monthly breakdown

  • Critical
  • High
  • Medium
  • Moderate
  • Low
  • 1 vulnerabilities
    • Critical: 1
    • High: 0
    • Medium: 0
    • Moderate: 0
    • Low: 0
  • 1 vulnerabilities
    • Critical: 1
    • High: 0
    • Medium: 0
    • Moderate: 0
    • Low: 0

Vulnerabilities (2)

Known vulnerabilities affecting tanstack-solid-start, based on data from OSV.

Vulnerabilities affecting tanstack-solid-start
IDSeveritySummaryAffected versionsPublishedSource
GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8CriticalTanStack Router: Unauthenticated reflected XSS in TanStack Start server-function responses## Impact An unauthenticated attacker can craft a URL to a server function in an affected TanStack Start app. If someone opens the link, the app can return attacker-controlled HTML from its own origin and run the attacker's JavaScript there. The script can access same-origin data available to that visitor and make requests with their authority. ## Cause The server-function transport can pass request payload fields into internal middleware state instead of limiting them to public input fields. A malformed payload can leave an attacker-controlled result in the error path. Response handling ca
  • >= 1.143.12, < 1.168.57
GitHub (opens in a new tab)
GHSA-g7cv-rxg3-hmpxCriticalMalware in @tanstack/* packages exfiltrates cloud credentials, GitHub tokens, and SSH keys## Summary On 2026-05-11, between approximately 19:20 and 19:26 UTC, 84 malicious versions across 42 `@tanstack/*` packages were published to the npm registry. The publishes were authenticated via the legitimate GitHub Actions OIDC trusted-publisher binding for `TanStack/router`, but the publish workflow itself was not modified. The attacker chained three known vulnerability classes — a `pull_request_target` "Pwn Request" misconfiguration, GitHub Actions cache poisoning across the fork↔base trust boundary, and runtime memory extraction of the OIDC token from the Actions runner process — to pu
  • >= 1.167.65, < 1.167.69
  • >= 1.167.68, < 1.167.69
GitHub (opens in a new tab)
  • GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8Critical
    TanStack Router: Unauthenticated reflected XSS in TanStack Start server-function responses
    • >= 1.143.12, < 1.168.57

    ## Impact An unauthenticated attacker can craft a URL to a server function in an affected TanStack Start app. If someone opens the link, the app can return attacker-controlled HTML from its own origin and run the attacker's JavaScript there. The script can access same-origin data available to that visitor and make requests with their authority. ## Cause The server-function transport can pass request payload fields into internal middleware state instead of limiting them to public input fields. A malformed payload can leave an attacker-controlled result in the error path. Response handling ca

    CVE: CVE-2026-102989

  • GHSA-g7cv-rxg3-hmpxCritical
    Malware in @tanstack/* packages exfiltrates cloud credentials, GitHub tokens, and SSH keys
    • >= 1.167.65, < 1.167.69
    • >= 1.167.68, < 1.167.69

    ## Summary On 2026-05-11, between approximately 19:20 and 19:26 UTC, 84 malicious versions across 42 `@tanstack/*` packages were published to the npm registry. The publishes were authenticated via the legitimate GitHub Actions OIDC trusted-publisher binding for `TanStack/router`, but the publish workflow itself was not modified. The attacker chained three known vulnerability classes — a `pull_request_target` "Pwn Request" misconfiguration, GitHub Actions cache poisoning across the fork↔base trust boundary, and runtime memory extraction of the OIDC token from the Actions runner process — to pu

    CVE: CVE-2026-45321

Showing 1-2 of 2 vulnerabilities