dompurify

### Summary DOMPurify drops `attributeName` attributes whose value contains `href`, so an allowed `<animate>` or `<set>` can't rewrite a link's href after sanitizing. The check compares the attribute name after `transformCaseFunc`, and that function doesn't lowercase in XHTML mode. In XHTML the attribute is spelled `attributeName`, so the comparison with `"attributename"` never matches and the guard does nothing. An app that uses `PARSER_MEDIA_TYPE: 'application/xhtml+xml'` and allows `animate` and `attributeName` will keep `<animate attributeName="href" values="x;javascript:alert(1)">`. Cli

CVE: CVE-2026-116802

## Summary When DOMPurify is configured with `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` together with a DOM-returning mode (`RETURN_DOM: true`, `RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true`, or `IN_PLACE: true`), template expressions such as `{{...}}`, `${...}`, and `<%...%>` survive sanitization inside the text content of an attached shadow root. The post-walk safety net `_scrubTemplateExpressions` (`src/purify.ts:1717`) was extended to recurse into `<template>.content`, but it never recurses into attached shadow roots. An attacker who can supply a DOM node carrying a shadow root (the `IN_PLACE` and shadow-aware `RETURN_DOM`

CVE: CVE-2026-116804

### Summary The 3.4.16 fix for GHSA-p98j-92pf-mc4p only covers a hook that removes the node it was called for. If an `IN_PLACE` hook removes a different node, like the current node's parent or a sibling that has not been visited yet, that subtree is never walked or neutralized. Event handlers in it stay on the elements, and an `<img onerror>` that was already loading fires after `sanitize()` returns. The README says: "Nodes that a hook detaches from the tree ... are treated as removed. In IN_PLACE mode their subtree is neutralized inline, so an `<img onload>` that was already loading when yo

CVE: CVE-2026-116803

## Environment - dompurify 3.4.15 (current npm release); reproduced independently on jsdom 30.0.1 and 29.1.1 (Node.js 20.x / 26.x) - Config: `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` on a Node input; `SAFE_FOR_XML` at its default (`true`) ## Summary The 3.4.9 fix for the IN_PLACE detached-root class added two protections on the IN_PLACE return path: a fail-closed `TypeError` in `_forceRemove` when a node selected for removal cannot be detached, and a `_neutralizeSubtree` pass (`dist/purify.js` line 1336) that strips non-allowlisted **attributes** from removed subtrees. Both miss the r

CVE: CVE-2026-109345

## Summary In `IN_PLACE` mode DOMPurify sanitizes the caller's live DOM subtree directly. To close a known hazard (GHSA-55q2-fjhq-7xh7), the library neutralizes any node a hook detaches during sanitization by stripping its subtree's non-allow-listed attributes, but this neutralization is wired only into the `beforeSanitizeElements` and `uponSanitizeElement` hook sites. An `afterSanitizeElements` or `afterSanitizeAttributes` hook that removes a non-root element (a documented, supported pattern) detaches that element's subtree with no neutralization, so descendant `on*` handlers remain armed on

CVE: CVE-2026-109344

### Summary During `IN_PLACE` sanitization, a hook that removes an element can leave that element's detached descendants executable. A descendant image can retain its attacker-provided `onload` handler and fire after `sanitize()` returns, even though the returned root is clean and the image remains disconnected from the document. ### Details In DOMPurify 3.4.12, `_sanitizeElements()` in `src/purify.ts:1862-1904` runs the `beforeSanitizeElements` or `uponSanitizeElement` hook and returns immediately when the hook detached the current node. The return does not call `_neutralizeSubtree(current

CVE: CVE-2026-75838

## Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-c2j3-45gr-mqc4. This link is maintained to preserve external references. ## Original Description DOMPurify before 3.4.12 fails to execute afterSanitizeElements hook for custom elements allowed via CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck, allowing attributes to bypass application security policies. Attackers can preserve sensitive attributes on custom elements that later re-inject them into innerHTML sinks, creating second-order XSS gadgets.

## Summary There is a possible hook-policy inconsistency in DOMPurify 3.4.11 involving `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING`. When a custom element is allowed via `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck`, it appears that the element does not go through `afterSanitizeElements` in the same way as a normal element. As a result, an application that relies on `afterSanitizeElements` as a security policy layer to strip sensitive attributes from all elements may see those attributes removed from normal elements but preserved on allowed custom elements. This does not appear to be a direct DOMPurify XSS or a case

CVE: CVE-2026-66010

## Summary DOMPurify 3.4.7 shipped a security fix ("permanent hook pollution") that makes a registered `uponSanitizeAttribute` hook's mutation of `data.allowedAttributes` **non-persistent** — so allowing an attribute for one element does not leak into later `sanitize()` calls. The fix clones `ALLOWED_ATTR` inside `_parseConfig`. That guard is **silently bypassed whenever the application uses the persistent-config API `DOMPurify.setConfig()`.** `setConfig()` sets the module flag `SET_CONFIG = true`, which causes `sanitize()` to **skip `_parseConfig` entirely** — and the clone-guard lives insi

CVE: CVE-2026-65898

# Hook mutation of `data.allowedTags` / `data.allowedAttributes` permanently pollutes `DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS` / `DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR` **CWE**: CWE-501 (Trust Boundary Violation — hook-scoped mutation leaks to global default sets) via CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure — the default allow-list is silently widened for all subsequent sanitize calls) ## Summary The `data.allowedTags` and `data.allowedAttributes` fields passed to `uponSanitizeElement` and `uponSanitizeAttribute` hooks are **direct references** to the library's live `ALLOWED_TAGS` / `ALLOWED_ATTR` sets. For sanitize calls that

CVE: CVE-2026-65902